Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 22.04.1994 - 15651/89   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1994,13219
EGMR, 22.04.1994 - 15651/89 (https://dejure.org/1994,13219)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22.04.1994 - 15651/89 (https://dejure.org/1994,13219)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22. April 1994 - 15651/89 (https://dejure.org/1994,13219)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,13219) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Verfahrensgang

Papierfundstellen

  • Serie A Nr. 286-B
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (40)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

    PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.1994 - 15651/89
    The instant case differs from the Piersack v. Belgium case (judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53) and the De Cubber v. Belgium case (judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86) in the nature of the duties performed by the judges who sat in those cases before the trial of the merits.
  • EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

    DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.1994 - 15651/89
    The instant case differs from the Piersack v. Belgium case (judgment of 1 October 1982, Series A no. 53) and the De Cubber v. Belgium case (judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86) in the nature of the duties performed by the judges who sat in those cases before the trial of the merits.
  • EGMR, 24.05.1989 - 10486/83

    HAUSCHILDT c. DANEMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.1994 - 15651/89
    What matters is the scope and nature of the measures taken by the judge before the trial (see the Hauschildt v. Denmark judgment of 24 May 1989, Series A no. 154, p. 21, para. 49, and the Nortier v. the Netherlands judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 267, p. 15, para. 33).
     
  • EGMR, 24.02.1993 - 14396/88

    FEY v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.1994 - 15651/89
    1 (art. 6-1) must be determined according to a subjective test, that is on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case, and also according to an objective test, that is ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see, among other authorities, the Fey v. Austria judgment of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255-A, p. 12, para. 28).
  • EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87

    PADOVANI v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.1994 - 15651/89
    What is decisive is whether this fear can be held to be objectively justified (ibid., p. 12, para. 30, and the Padovani v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 20, para. 27).
  • EGMR, 24.08.1993 - 13924/88

    NORTIER c. PAYS-BAS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.04.1994 - 15651/89
    What matters is the scope and nature of the measures taken by the judge before the trial (see the Hauschildt v. Denmark judgment of 24 May 1989, Series A no. 154, p. 21, para. 49, and the Nortier v. the Netherlands judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 267, p. 15, para. 33).
  • EGMR, 12.12.2002 - 59021/00

    Massaker von Distomo

    Wichtig sei vielmehr, dass diese Würdigung zusammen mit dem Urteil erfolgt und sich auf die in der Hauptverhandlung beigebrachten und erörterten Fakten stützt (siehe sinngemäß Hauschildt ./. Dänemark, Urteil vom 24. Mai 1989, Serie A Bd. 154, S. 22, Randnr. 50; Nortier ./. Niederlande, Urteil vom 24. August 1993, Serie A Bd. 267, S. 15, Randnr. 33; Saraiva de Carvalho ./. Portugal, Urteil vom 22. April 1994, Serie A Bd. 286-B, S. 38, Randnr. 35).
  • EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91

    DIENNET v. FRANCE

    The Court is thus extending - without explanation - to disciplinary bodies a trend that is fairly recent in its case-law (see the following judgments: Fey v. Austria of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255-A, p. 12, para. 30; Padovani v. Italy of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 20, para. 27; Nortier v. the Netherlands of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 267, pp. 15-16, paras. 31-37, with my concurring opinion, pp. 18-19; and Saraiva de Carvalho v. Portugal of 22 April 1994, Series A no. 286-B) and is difficult enough as it is to reconcile with the earlier case-law as set forth in the Piersack, De Cubber, Hauschildt and Thorgeir Thorgeirson judgments previously cited.
  • EGMR, 22.02.1996 - 17358/90

    BULUT v. AUSTRIA

    [21] Saraiva de Carvalho v. Portugal judgment of 22 April 1994, Series A no. 286-B, p. 32, paras.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht